🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.